Thursday, August 20, 2009

Industry Problems: Exhibit A

I've been having a very difficult time getting myself back into blogging. Reviews are becoming increasingly difficult to write, because honestly, there are only so many adjectives in the English language to describe music. In order to ease myself back into the groove of things, I figured I would just write what comes to mind - the misconception that today's musicians lack talent.

Several months ago I argued that Rock was alive, and going strong. I haven't veered from that original opinion, but just because I think there is a litany of quality music out there, doesn't necessarily mean that music industry is healthy, nor is the society that digests it.

The biggest issue plaguing the music industry today is the fact that consumers have turned to this childish mentality of instant gratification and labels are catering to Wall Street before fans. Bands are signed to short term deals, and if things don't pan out after their first record, or if lucky their second, they are dropped and required to pick up the tab for all debts accrued from recording costs - signing a deal is an extremely risky venture. Bands don't have the ability to grow and find themselves through years of touring and recording like once before. If today's industry standards applied twenty or thirty years ago, would bands who didn't charge out of the gates with enormous success be dropped before they were ever able to shine? Bruce Springsteen, who is one of the most iconic figures in rock history, may be roaming the streets of Asbury Park, NJ with a tin can in his hands if it weren't for his opportunity to grow as an artist.

It's not the artists who are flawed, but instead, the industry, the critics, and even the listeners. Musicians are kept on a short leash now and days, and the five or so labels which dominate the industry are looking for immediate success and anything short of a Billboard landing album is as good as dirt. Growth and experience have become archaic ideas, and its all about cashing in immediately. Certainly there are more problems than just this in the industry - don't even get me started on Clear Channel - but this is one of the most high ranking issues in my mind. Today's musicians aren't untalented or uncreative, their abilities are parallel to those who we hold in such high esteem, the problem is these talents aren't cultivated. Given a little time, the results are endless.

8 Comments:

Blogger musicobsessive said...

You are certainly right about allowing time to develop. Remember, Sgt Pepper was the Beatles' eigth album, as was Pink Floyd's 'Dark Side of the Moon'.

How many bands today would be indulged over the previous seven? - Especially the likes of Ummagumma!!

3:18 AM  
Blogger The Rock Brigade Blogger said...

Well said! I think there are many a legend that would have not reached that iconic status by today's standards.

And yes, the adjectives eventually get limited, so feel free to recycle. Cheers!!

http://the-brigade.blogspot.com/

8:07 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

musicobsessive - I was debating between Floyd and Springsteen as an example, I opted for Springsteen because I was afraid of showing my extreme biases towards Floyd. I'm glad you commented on it though!

Rock Brigade - Writing reviews is my least favorite part of blogging. I'm finding it increasingly harder to describe music without sounding repetitive amongst other things. Thanks for the input.

2:07 PM  
Blogger drewzepmeister said...

I couldn't agree more with you, Jeff. This is one of my biggest gripes in the music business. It seems like people are waiting to see the music evolve. Take a look at Rush. It wasn't until there 2112 lp before they got into the mainstream. Look at them now.

10:38 PM  
Blogger Sean Coleman said...

Time to grow has been a sticking point for many promising bands that have landed a deal only to find out that the conditions attached were restrictive to the point of ridiculousness.

That being said, the majority of what is being marketed really isn't that interesting. Too many styles have been mashed together in the digital age resulting in music that doesn't have much of its own identity. You have to keep your ear to the ground to really find something special, though it is out there.

1:17 AM  
Blogger lixue said...

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Susan

http://disturbialyrics.net

9:18 AM  
Blogger Barbara(aka Layla) said...

I won't pretend I have anything more to add here just wanted to say this was a great post and I agree too!

2:58 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Drew - There would certainly be a void in music history without Rush.

Sean - There's definitely great music out there, but as you said, it's not going to be easy to find listening to find if you're just listening to something like the radio.

Layla - Thanks!

4:07 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Where Classic Rock and Modern Rock Meet