Friday, March 28, 2008

3) Yes

One can certainly make an argument that Yes is the most definitive Progressive Rock band in history. When thinking of what prog rock should sound like, I immediately think of the symphonic sounds, long pieces weaving in and out of each other, and abstract lyrics about the oddest of topics which rarely deal with personal emotions. Yes encompasses all of these characteristics; they were able to do so unlike any band before them. They are the poster child for Progressive Rock, and deservingly so.

The soaring voice of Jon Anderson makes Yes inherently unique. His high pitched vocals all but define their sound, and without Anderson manning the mic Yes becomes half the band they used to be. The great guitar work of Howe is also a defining factor of the band, from his fantastic use of harmonics and his unbelievable speed which goes sorely overlooked. One can never forget the fantastic keyboardist Wakeman who delivers the symphonic sounds and bass player Chris Squire who delivers the beat which catapults the music forward.

Yes has gone on to create some of the most important prog works in history, like the timeless Close to the Edge and Fragile. What made Yes one of the most incredible bands of their era was just how far ahead of the times they were. Using musical techniques never before used and having members from all musical ranges created a magical listening experience. Throughout their career there were rough patches, for example gripes between members and some lackluster material released, but in the end their career was overwhelmingly defined by success. They were masters of progressive rock, and helped make prog rock a commercially sustainable genre with hits like "Roundabout" and "I've Seen All Good People." For any band looking to mimic the genre, Yes is the band to listen to.

Essential Albums: Close to the Edge and Fragile

6 Comments:

Blogger paul and dave said...

is King Crimson in the top 2, i am bit stumped on the other one; please dont say Amon Duul,

8:53 PM  
Blogger The Mad Hatter said...

Hmmm, putting these guys at 3 is interesting only because it makes me even more curious about the top 2. I do hate Yes, though, despite their obvious influence and scope. Anderson's voice pretty much steers me away. I just can't get past it. Just like Cedric on Amputechture -- he just goes too high with his voice.

8:23 AM  
Blogger David Amulet said...

A great write-up. I agree, even if I find some of the more lengthy Yes pieces to be overkill. I'm also odd in liking some of the Yes stuff without Anderson and Howe (Drama is one of my favorites, even though I recognize it's not really Yes.)

What do you think of Anderson Bruford Wakeman Howe?

8:45 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Paul and Dave - Well I don't want to give anything away but I can assure you that Amon Duul is not in the top two.

Mad Hatter - His voice definitely takes some getting used to. It took me around give years to start listening to Rush because of the Geddy Lee's voice.

David - I think Anderson Bruford Wakeman Howe were pretty good, I definitely prefer them over the material Yes was putting out in the 80s like Big Generator.

Also, Drama isn't a bad album in my opinion, I think it often just gets a bad rap for not "really" being Yes.

12:11 PM  
Blogger The Mad Hatter said...

Jeff,

Is his voice coffee? Because I never got used to that, hehe. Music isn't an acquired taste for me.

3:13 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Mad Hatter - Nahh, I would say more like Espresso, it hits you harder than coffee.

I don't force myself to like music, but sometimes after hearing something so many times on the radio or through other people I can start to grasp it better. I never found it difficult to like Yes because it was one of my parents favorite bands so I heard them often.

12:59 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Where Classic Rock and Modern Rock Meet